Fight Corrupted Family Courts and CPS

Fight back and get your kids back NOW!

Orange County Child Custody “Charade” Exposed

leave a comment »

Submitted by Betsy J. Wolfenden on Tue, 12/28/2010 – 2:15pm

RALEIGH –12/28/10 – Last week, the North Carolina Court of Appeals vacated a  child custody order entered by Orange County District Court Judge Joe Buckner,  calling the child custody case a “charade.” The case involves a 3-year old boy  who was removed from Nevada by Mormons so he could be adopted in North Carolina  without his mother’s consent.

The Court of Appeals agreed with the young boy’s mother, Emily M. McManaway,  that Judge Buckner’s order must be vacated because he failed to hear any  evidence before awarding sole custody of McManaway’s son to her brother and his  wife when they had already given the young boy away to a Surry County couple  they had met online.

Betsy J. Wolfenden, McManaway’s former attorney, was able to stop the illegal  adoption of her client’s son, but after the Surry County couple refused to  return the child, Wolfenden filed a motion in Orange County District Court to  have Judge Buckner’s custody order set aside.  The Court of Appeals held that  Judge Buckner’s refusal to set aside his custody order was an abuse of  discretion when he failed to hold a custody hearing and when the order contained “patently false” findings. The Mormon couples were represented in Orange County  District Court by Attorneys Donna Ambler Rice and Leigh A. Peek.

Wolfenden, a UNC law school graduate, was disbarred in July of this year  after the North Carolina State Bar accused her of filing “frivolous” lawsuits  against Davis and Peek on behalf of McManaway. The State Bar also found that  Wolfenden was a danger to the public. “I feel vindicated by the opinion,” says  Wolfenden. “I have asserted all along that it is the corruption in Orange County  District Court which endangers the public, and I was disbarred for speaking out  against it.”

Wolfenden ran for Orange County District Court judge in 2008, claiming the  constitutional rights of parents are frequently violated in that court.  During  the election, Buckner, Davis and Peek brought dozens of anonymous grievances  against her with the State Bar.  Wolfenden lost the election and Buckner, Davis  and Peek later testified against her at her State Bar hearing.  Wolfenden is  currently suing the State Bar, Buckner, Davis and Peek for malicious  prosecution, obstruction of justice, and for conspiring to defame her.

The link to the Court of Appeals’ opinion:

Bohannan  v. McManaway

The link to Wolfenden’s amended complaint against the North Carolina State  Bar:

Wolfenden  v. Lunsford Long et al.

Read more:


Written by dawneworswick

July 11, 2011 at 10:40 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: